@article{Winata_Setiawan_Adrian_Dharma Perkasa_Roxanne_2023, title={Comparison between Figo and Nichd Criteria in Assessing Fetal Heart Rate}, volume={5}, url={https://ej-med.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/1284}, DOI={10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.3.1284}, abstractNote={<p>Assessing the fetal heart rate (FHR) is one of the most important aspects of antenatal care and delivery. Fetal heart rate is one indicator of fetal well-being. Assessing FHR can be done by auscultation or by using a cardiotocography (KTG) device, also known as an <em>Electronic Fetal Monitor </em>(EFM). In interpreting the results of the cardiotocography examination, there are two criteria used to interpret the condition of the fetus, namely the criteria issued by the <em>International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics </em>(FIGO) and <em>the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development </em>(NICHD).</p>}, number={3}, journal={European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences}, author={Winata, I Gde Sastra and Setiawan, William Alexander and Adrian, Jonathan and Dharma Perkasa, Gede Odi Bayu and Roxanne, Joanne}, year={2023}, month={May}, pages={1–3} }