Flawed Studies of SIMS’s Diagnostic Accuracy by Teams of Puente-López and Capilla Ramírez



Abstract Views
686

Downloads
597

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Feb 20, 2021
Published Mar 14, 2021
10.24018/ejmed.2021.3.2.730

Abstract viewed = 686 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Background: The teams of Puente-López and Capilla Ramírez evaluated diagnostic accuracy of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS), a test often used to assess malingering by persons injured in motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). Yet all SIMS items represent legitimate medical symptoms, and more than 50% of them are those experienced by severely injured motorists, but they are fallaciously scored as indicative of malingering. Thus, more injured patients with more symptoms obtain higher SIMS scores for malingering.

Method: The studies by Puente-López and by Capilla Ramírez were carried out on SIMS scores of injured motorists. The present article assesses the severity of their injuries, as documented by Puente-López and by Capilla Ramírez.

Results and Discussion: The study by Capilla Ramírez’s team excluded patients with pathological results on physical examinations, or on X-Rays, EMG, and MRI: thus, only mildly injured motorists were included. The patients of Puente-López had signs of only a mild cervical whiplash. Almost none reported lower back pain or dizziness. Thus, both studies included patients with only mild symptoms that resulted in very low SIMS scores: they scored within the non-malingering range as defined by the SIMS manual. Their scores were below SIMS scores of healthy persons instructed to feign whiplash symptoms from an MVA. The teams of Capilla Ramírez and of Puente-López erroneously interpreted these results as demonstrating diagnostic accuracy of the SIMS for detection of malingering in injured motorists.

Conclusions: The two studies of very mildly injured motorists fail to demonstrate “diagnostic accuracy of the SIMS” because the SIMS is mostly used by insurance contracted psychologists on more severely injured MVA patients (those with whiplash and post-concussion syndrome), i.e., those with more symptoms and thus, with higher SIMS scores that fallaciously classify them as “malingerers.”

Keywords: malingering, SIMS, whiplash, car accidents

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Smith GP, Burger GK. Detection of malingering: Validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of the American Academy on Psychiatry and Law. 1997; 25:180-183.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  2. Cernovsky ZZ, Mendonça JD, Ferrari JR, Sidhu G, Velamoor V, Mann SC, et al. Content Validity of the Affective Disorder Subscale of the SIMS. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2019; 2(2):33-39.
     Google Scholar
  3. Cernovsky Z, Bureau Y, Mendonça J, Velamoor V, Mann S, et al. Validity of the SIMS Scales of Neurologic Impairment and Amnestic Disorder. International Journal of Psychiatry Sciences. 2019;1(1):13-19.
     Google Scholar
  4. Cernovsky ZZ, Mendonça JD, Ferrari JR, Bureau YRJ. Content validity of SIMS low intelligence scale. International Journal of Research in Medical Science. 2019; 1(1):21-25.
     Google Scholar
  5. Cernovsky Z, Mendonça JD, Oyewumi LK, Ferrari JR, Sidhu G, Campbell R, et al. Content Validity of the Psychosis Subscale of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science. 2019;5(3):121-127.
     Google Scholar
  6. Widows MR, Smith GP. Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology - Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: PAR Inc., 2005.
     Google Scholar
  7. Rogers R, Robinson EV, Gillard ND. The SIMS Screen for Feigned Mental Disorders: the Development of Detection-based Scales. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 2014;32(4):455-466. doi:10.1002/bsl.2131.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  8. Wolf E, Ellickson-Larew S, Guetta RE, Escarfulleri S, Ryabchenko K, and Miller MW. Psychometric performance of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST) in veteran PTSD assessment. Psychological Injury and Law. Published online April 15, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09373-y.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  9. Cernovsky ZZ, Mendonça JD, Ferrari JR. Meta Analysis of SIMS Scores of Survivors of Car Accidents and of Instructed Malingerers. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2020;3(1):1-11.
     Google Scholar
  10. Cernovsky Z, Mann S, Diamond DM, Mendonça J, Tenenbaum S, Persad E, Velamoor V, Woodbury-Fariña MA, Husni M, Gutierrez J. Irremediably Flawed Nature of Analog Validation Methodology of Malingering Tests. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2020; 3(2): 39-45.
     Google Scholar
  11. Capilla Ramírez P, González Ordi H, Santamaría Fernández P, Casado Morales MI. Detección deexageración de síntomas en esguince cervical: pacientes clínicos versus sujetos análogos (Detection of symptom exaggeration in whiplash: patients versus analogue participants). Trauma (Spain). 2014; 25 (1): 4-10.
     Google Scholar
  12. Puente-López E, Pina D, Ruiz-Hernández JA, Llor-Esteban B. Diagnostic accuracy of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) in motor vehicle accident patients. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 2021;32(1):131-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2020.1833073.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  13. González-Ordi, H. y Santamaría, P. Adaptación española del Inventario Estructurado de Simulación de Síntomas. [Spanish adaptation of the SIMS]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  14. Cernovsky ZZ, Mann SC, Velamoor VR, and Oyewumi LK. The Need for Three Separate Parallel WAD Ratings of Whiplash Injuries to Cervical, Lumbosacral, and Thoracic Spine in Clinical Assessments of Injured Motorists. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2021;3(1):1-6. doi: 10.24018/ejmed.2021.3.1.699.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  15. Fakharian E, Mohammadzadeh M, Saberi HR, Fazel MR, Rejali M, Akbari H, Mirzadeh AS, Mohammadzadeh J. Spinal injury resulting from car accident: Focus to prevention. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;12(2):180-184. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.152110: 10.4103/1793-5482.152110.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  16. Robertson A, Branfoot T, Barlow IF, Giannoudis PV. Spinal injury patterns resulting from car and motorcycle accidents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(24):2825-30. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200212150-00019.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  17. Cernovsky ZZ, Ferrari JJR, Mendonça JD. Pseudodiagnoses of Malingering of Neuropsychological Symptoms in Survivors of Car Accidents by the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2019; 2(1): 55 65.
     Google Scholar
  18. Cernovsky ZZ, Mann SC, Velamoor V, Oyewumi LK, Diamond DM, Litman LC. Validation of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) on Patients Injured in High Impact Car Accidents. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2021;4(1):14-22. doi.org/10.22259/2638-5201.0401003.
     Google Scholar
  19. Cernovsky Z, Fattahi M. Meta analysis of scale cutoffs in the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. International Journal of Psychology Sciences. 2020;1(1):1 7.
     Google Scholar
  20. Rogers R, Jackson R, and Kaminski P. Factitious Psychological Disorders: The Overlooked Response Style in Forensic Evaluations. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 2005;5(1):21-41. doi:10.1300/J158v05n01_02.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  21. Santamaría Fernández P. Utilidad diagnóstica del inventario estructurado de simulación de síntomas (SIMS) en población española. [Diagnostic utility of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) in Spanish population.] Ph.D. Thesis. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Complutense, 2015. https://eprints.ucm.es/28412/1/T35741.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  22. Giger P, Merten T, Merckelbach H, and Oswald M. Detection of Feigned Crime-Related Amnesia: A Multi-Method Approach. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 2010;10(5):440. doi:10.1080/15228932.2010.489875.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  23. Clegg C, Fremouw W, and Mogge NL. Utility of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) and the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) in screening for malingering among outpatients seeking to claim disability. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 2009: 20(2): 239-254. doi:10.1080/14789940802267760.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  24. Edens JF, Otto RK, and Dwyer T. Utility of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology in identifying persons motivated to malinger psychopathology. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 1999;27(3):387-396.
     Google Scholar
  25. Merten T, Diederich C, Stevens A. Vorgetäuschte Beschwerden nach Distorsionstrauma der Halswirbelsäule: eine experimentelle Simulationsstudie (Feigned Symptoms after Whiplash Injury: An Experimental Analogue Study). Aktuelle Neurologie. 2008;35:8-15. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-986232.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  26. Cernovsky ZZ, Ferrari JR. Rogers=s RS und SC Malingering Scales Derived from the SIMS. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2020;3(1):34 44.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)