##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Medico-legal cases presented to the Accident & Emergency department vary from hospital to hospital. Profiling these cases from time to time provides an insight into the workload of medico-legal cases as well as what is going on in and around the locality. The present study was conducted at LHMC, New Delhi from January 2021 to June 2022 from the available records of MLCs from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2021. Out of a total of 5702 MLCs, males were 85.77%. Victims of the age group 21–30 years formed the majority (36.30%) of the cases followed by age groups 31–40 years (25.44%). The time of incidence was between 6 p.m. and 11.59 p.m. in the majority (42.00%) cases. The time of reporting was between 6 p.m. and 11.59 p.m. in the majority (40.05%) of cases. A majority (56.92%) of the victims had reported within 1 hour of the incident. The cause was blunt force trauma in more than half (51.05%) cases, followed by RTA (17.93%) and poisoning (17.84%). In more than half (56.51%) cases, the manner was homicidal, followed by accidental including RTA (23.95%) and suicidal (19.35%). The surgery department was found involved in more than 2/3 (69.15%) cases, followed by Orthopaedics (31.85%), Medicine (20.199%) and ENT (19.52%). In 85.50% of cases, the victims were discharged within 24 hours. Hospital death in MLCs was 4.15% whereas 1.87% of victims were referred to other hospitals for further management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Introduction

Analysis of the medico-legal cases presented to the casualty of a hospital gives an understanding of what unnatural things are happening to human beings in and around the particular locality. Lady Hardinge Medical College & Smt. S.K. Hospital is situated in the heart of Delhi, adjacent to Connaught Place catering for the people of New Delhi and central Delhi districts. However, two other large government hospitals, LNJP Hospital and Dr RML Hospital are also lying within a distance of 2–5 km. Therefore, patients turn to these hospitals because of their convenience and the kind of services available in these hospitals. In case of emergency medical needs, odd hours or medico-legal cases, the casualty remains the target place for the patients and police. Thus analysis of the medico-legal cases of a hospital from time to time helps to fulfill the medical needs of the nearby patients with the development of proper infrastructures, manpower, strategy and policies.

Aim and Objectives

  1. To analyze the profile of medico-legal cases presented to the Accident & Emergency Department, SSKH, New Delhi.
  2. To compare the volume of medico-legal cases during the 2019 non-Covid and 2020–2021 Covid periods.
  3. To analyze the nature, manner and outcome of the medico-legal cases.

Materials and Methods

After obtaining ethical clearance from the institutional ethics committee, the present 2-year retrospective (from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2020) and 1-year prospective study (from 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2021) study was conducted in the Department of Forensic Medicine, Department of Accident & Emergency and Medical Record Department at Lady Hardinge Medical College & Smt. S.K. Hospital, New Delhi from January 2021 to June 2022 by collecting all the relevant data available in the MLC records of the study period using pre-designed pro forma, then transferred to MS Excel sheet and analysed.

Results and Discussion

Magnitude of MLCs at LHMC, New Delhi

The total number of MLCs registered from 1st January 2019 till 31st December 2021 was 5702. Out of those, 2581 (45.26%) MLCs were found registered in the year 2019 (Pre-Covid year), 1955 (34.28%) MLCs were registered in the year 2020 and 1166 (20.44%) MLCs were registered in the year 2021 (Table I). Hence, there was a significant drop in MLCs during the Covid-19 period.

Sl. No. Year No. of MLCs Percentage
1 2019 2581 45.26
2 2020 1955 34.28
3 2021 1166 20.44
Total 5702 100
Table I. Number of Medico-Legal Cases

Sex

Out of a total of 5702 cases, males were found in 4891 (85.77%) MLCs whereas females were found in 810 (14.20%) MLCs. Only one transgender individual was involved in MLC as a case of RTA in the year 2021 (Table II). Our findings were similar to the studies reported by references [1]–[38].

Sl. No. Year Male Percentage Female Percentage Transgender Percentage Total
1 2019 2275 88.14 306 11.85 0 0 2581
2 2020 1725 88.23 230 11.76 0 0 1955
3 2021 891 76.41 274 23.49 1 0.08 1166
Total 4891 85.77 810 14.20 1 0.01 5702
Table II. Gender of the Individuals in Medico-Legal Cases

Age

Out of a total of 5702 MLCs, victims of the age group 21–30 years (N = 2070; 36.30%) form the majority of the cases followed by age groups 31–40 years (N = 1451; 25.44%), and 41–50 years (N = 918; 16.09%), respectively (Table III). The age range was from Newborn baby to 95 years old. The average age of the victims was 34.53 years and the median age was 32 years. Our findings were similar to the studies reported by references [1], [3]–[9], [11], [13], [15], [16], [18]–[25], and [27]–[38].

Sl. No. Age Group in Years Number of Cases Percentage
1 1–10 1 0.01
2 11–20 587 10.29
3 21–30 2070 36.30
4 31–40 1451 25.44
5 41–50 918 16.09
6 51–60 427 7.48
7 61–70 190 3.33
8 71–80 42 0.73
9 81–90 15 0.26
10 91–100 1 0.01
Total 5702 100
Table III. Age Groups of the Individuals in Medico-Legal Cases

However, the medico-legal cases in the paediatric age group in our study do not reflect the true figures as the data were collected from Sucheta Kripalini Hospital only. Lady Hardinge Medical College has a separate Kalavati Saran Children’s Hospital to deal with paediatric age group patients.

Time of Incidence

Barring 93 MLCs where details were not available and 469 cases where natural disease cases were registered under MLCs, among the rest 5140 MLCs, the time of incidence was between 6 p.m.–11.59 p.m. in majority (N = 2159; 42.00%) cases, followed by 12 p.m.–5.59 p.m. (N = 1313; 25.54%) and 6 a.m.–11.59 a.m. (N = 943; 18.34%), respectively (Table IV).

Sl. No. Time of Incidence Number of Cases Percentage
1 12 a.m.– 5.59 a.m. 725 Subtotal = 5140 14.10
2 6 a.m.–11.59 a.m. 943 18.34
3 12 p.m.–5.59 p.m. 1313 25.54
4 6 p.m.–11.59 p.m. 2159 42.00
5 Details not available 93 Total 100
6 Not Applicable (Natural Diseases) 469
Total 5702
Table IV. Time of Incidence

Reference [6] has reported that the majority (29.49%) of the incidents occurred between 12 p.m. to 4 p.m., followed by 27.29% between 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. Reference [9] reported that the majority of the incidents occurred during the evening. Reference [24] reported that the majority (37.6%) occurred between 12 p.m. to 6 p.m., followed by 34.3% between 6 p.m. to 12 a.m. Reference [36] reported that the peak time of incidence was between 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. (33.5%).

Time of Reporting

Among the 5140 MLCs, the time of reporting was between 6 p.m.–11.59 p.m. in the majority (N = 2059; 40.05%) cases, followed by 12 p.m.–5.59 p.m. (N = 1327; 25.81%) and 12 a.m.–5.59 a.m. (N = 971; 18.89%), respectively (Table V). Thus evening hour was the busiest period to deal with medico-legal cases at the Accident & Emergency Department at SSKH.

Sl. No. Time of Reporting Number of Cases Percentage
1 12 a.m.–5.59 a.m. 971 18.89
2 6 a.m.–11.59 a.m. 783 15.23
3 12 p.m.–5.59 p.m. 1327 25.81
4 6 p.m.–11.59 p.m. 2059 40.05
Total 5140 100
Table V. Time of Reporting at the Hospital

Reference [5] reported that the peak time of reporting was between 12 p.m. to 6 p.m. Reference [15] reported that the majority (36.9%) of victims reported between 12 p.m. to 6 p.m., followed by 35% between 6 p.m. to 12 a.m. Reference [19] has reported that majority (31.18%) of victims reported between 6 p.m. to 12 a.m., followed by 30.59% between 12 p.m. to 6 p.m. Reference [21] has reported that the majority (40.8%) of victims reported between 8 p.m. to 8 a.m., followed by 32.8% between 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Reference [23] reported that the majority (37.44%) of victims reported between 12 p.m. to 6 p.m. Reference [24] reported that the majority (36.7%) of victims reported between 12 p.m. to 6 p.m., followed by 34.3% between 6 p.m. to 12 a.m. Reference has reported that the majority (40.5%) of victims reported between 6 p.m. to 12 a.m., followed by 32.5% between 12 p.m. to 6 p.m. Reference [37] reported that most of the cases reported between 12 p.m. to 6 p.m. (35.61%) followed by 6 p.m. to 12 a.m. (35.23%).

The Time Gap between the Incidence and Reporting

Out of 5140 MLCs, the victims had reported within 1 hour of the incidence in the majority (N = 2926; 56.92%) of cases, followed by within 1–2 hours (N = 1368; 26.61%) (Table VI). Our findings were similar to the studies reported in References [5], [14], [20], [22], [23], [30]–[32], and [38].

Sl. No. Duration Number of Cases Percentage
1 <1 hour 2926 56.92
2 1–2 hours 1368 26.61
3 2–4 hours 464 9.02
4 4–12 hours 232 4.51
5 >12 hours 150 2.91
Total 5140 100
Table VI. Duration between Time of Incidence and Time of Reporting

Person Presented the MLCs to the Hospital

The MLCs were presented to the hospital by the police in the majority (N = 1810; 31.74%) cases, followed by relatives (N = 1577; 27.65%), self (N = 1269; 22.25%) and by unknown person (N = 953; 16.71%) (Table VII). No other study was found to compare these findings.

Sl. No. Presented by Number of Cases Percentage
1 Police 1810 31.74
2 Relative 1577 27.65
3 Self 1269 22.25
4 Unknown 953 16.71
5 Details not available 93 1.63
Total 5702 100
Table VII. Person Who Presented the MLCs to the Hospital

Alleged History of the Causes of MLCs

Out of 5140 MLCs, the alleged history of a causative factor was blunt force trauma in more than half (N = 2624; 51.05%) cases, followed by RTA (N = 922; 17.93%) and poisoning (N = 917; 17.84%), respectively (Table VIII). Our findings were similar to the studies reported by references [10], [25]–[27], and [29].

Sl. No. Alleged History Number of Cases Percentage
1 Blunt force trauma 2624 51.05
2 RTA 922 17.93
3 Poisoning 917 17.84
4 Sharp force trauma 311 6.05
5 Fall from height 213 4.14
6 Stabbing 42 0.81
7 Railways Injury 30 0.58
8 Electrocution 24 0.46
9 Industrial Accident 24 0.46
10 Hanging 13 0.25
11 Sexual Assault 8 0.15
12 Strangulation 3 0.05
13 Firearm Injury 3 0.05
14 Burn 3 0.05
16 Animal Bite 2 0.03
17 Smothering 1 0.01
Total 5140 100
Table VIII. Alleged History of Causation in Medico-Legal Cases

However, references [3]–[8], [11]–[13], [15]–[17], [18], [20], [22]–[24], [28], [30], [32]–[37] have reported that Road Traffic Accidents were major causes of medico-legal cases presented to the hospitals. Reference [38] reported that poisoning was the major cause of admission to the casualty.

Manner of Causation in MLCs

Out of 5140 MLCs, more than half (N = 2905: 56.51%) of victims the manner was homicidal, followed by accidental including RTA (N = 1232; 23.95%) and suicidal (N = 995; 19.35%), respectively (Table IX).

Sl. No. Manner of Causation Number of Cases Percentage
1 Accidental 1232 23.95
2 Homicidal 2905 56.51
3 Suicidal 995 19.35
4 Sexual assault 8 0.15
Total 5140 100
Table IX. Manner of Causation in Medico-Legal Cases

Reference [5] has reported that in the majority (69.03%) of MLCs, the manner was accidental. Reference [4] has reported that the manners were accidental-75.4%, suicidal-15.5% and homicidal-5.9%. Similarly, reference [31] reported that the manners were accidental-52.4%, suicidal-41.41% and homicidal-5.03%. Reference [32] reported that the manner was accidental in 79.9%. Reference [38] reported that the manner was an assault in the majority (39.6%) of cases.

Department Involved in Managing the MLCs

Out of a total of 5609 MLCs (5702-93), where details were available, the Surgery department was found involved in more than 2/3 (N = 3879; 69.15%) cases, followed by the departments of Orthopaedics (N = 1787; 31.85%), Medicine (N = 1133; 20.199%), ENT (N = 1095; 19.52%), respectively. The Department of Forensic Medicine was found involved only in 1 (0.01%) case (Table X).

Sl. No. Department Number of Cases Percentage
1 Surgery 3879 69.15
2 Orthopaedics 1787 31.85
3 Medicine 1133 20.19
4 ENT 1095 19.52
5 Psychiatry 479 8.53
6 Dental 377 6.72
7 Ophthalmology 364 6.48
8 Obstetrics & Gynaecology 24 0.42
9 Anaesthesia 3 0.05
10 Dermatology 3 0.05
11 FMT 1 0.01
Total 9145
Table X. Department Involved in Managing the MLCs

Reference [12] reported that the majority (52.94%) of the MLCs were managed by the Surgery department, followed by 43.28% by the Orthopaedics department. Reference [21] also reported that the majority (93%) of MLCs were managed by the Surgery department, followed by the Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery departments, respectively. Reference [32] reported that the majority (69.96%) of the MLCs were managed by the Surgery department, followed by Orthopaedics (58.99%) and Medicine (35.88%), respectively.

Number of Department(s) Involved in Managing the MLCs

Out of a total of 5609 MLCs (5702-93), where details were available, the majority (N = 2562; 45.67%) cases were handled and managed by a single department whereas in 2299 (40.98%) cases, they were managed by two departments and in 748 (13.33%) cases, they were managed by more than two departments (Table XI). Reference [32] reported that in the majority (64.93%) of MLCs, opinions were sought from a single department, followed by two departments (26.72%) and more than two departments (8.35%), respectively.

Sl. No. Number of Department (s) involved Number of Cases Percentage
1 1 2562 45.67
2 2 2299 40.98
3 >2 748 13.33
Total 5609 100
Table XI. Number of Department(s) Involved in Managing the Medico-Legal Cases

Radiological Investigations Required in MLCs

Out of a total of 5609 MLCs (5702-93), where details were available, a radiological investigation was advised in the majority (n = 3038; 54.16%) cases followed by CT scan (N = 1883; 33.57%), USG (N = 1655; 29.50%) and MRI (N = 39; 0.69%), respectively (Table XII). No other study was found to compare these findings.

Sl. No. Nature of Investigation Number of Cases Percentage
1 X-Ray 3038 54.16
2 CT scan 1883 33.57
3 USG 1655 29.50
4 MRI 39 0.69
Total 6615
Table XII. Radiological Investigations Required in Medico-Legal Cases

Duration of Stay in the Hospital in MLCs

Out of a total of 5609 MLCs (5702-93), where details were available, in 4796 (85.50%) cases, the stay of the victims in the hospital was less than 24 hours whereas in 813 (14.49%) cases, the stay in the hospital was more than 24 hours and maximum up to 97 days (Table XIII). Most of the patients who stayed in the hospital for longer durations were victims of RTA with bone fractures.

Sl. No. Duration of Stay Number of Cases Percentage
1 <24 hours Discharged 3254 4796 85.50
Absconded 1384
Death 139
LA.M.A 15
No Records 1
Admission Cancelled 3
2 >24 hours (Maximum up to 97 days) 813 14.49
Total 5609 100
Table XIII. Duration of Stay in the Hospital in Medico-Legal Cases

Reference [23] reported that the majority (90.89%) of the victims of MLCs were discharged from the hospital within 1 week of admission to the hospital.

Outcome in the MLCs

Out of a total of 5702 MLCs, about 1/3 i.e., 3789 (66.45%) victims were discharged followed by those who absconded from the hospital (N = 1544; 27.07%), death (N = 237; 4.15%) and referred for further management (N = 107; 1.87%), respectively (Table XIV).

Sl. No. Outcome Number of Cases Percentage
1 Discharged 3789 66.45
2 Absconded 1544 27.07
3 Death 237 4.15
4 Referred for treatment 107 1.87
5 LA.M.A 21 0.36
6 Admission cancelled 3 0.05
7 No records 1 0.01
Total 5702 100
Table XIV. Outcome in the Medico-Legal Cases

Reference [13] reported that 0.6% of victims of MLCs were referred to other higher hospitals for treatment and LA.M.A cases were 1.63%. Reference [14] reported that 85.71% of MLCs in the paediatric age group were discharged, 1.68% absconded, 5.04% were referred to other hospitals for further management and deaths were 2.06%. Reference [20] reported that 80.69% of MLCs were discharged, deaths were 9.68% whereas 4.45% of MLCs were referred to other hospitals for further management. Reference [24] reported that 66.1% of MLCs were discharged, deaths were 9.9% whereas 11.6% of MLCs were LA.M.A. Reference [30] reported that 78.4% of MLCs were discharged, deaths were 9.59% whereas 4.69% MLCs were referred to other hospitals for further management. Reference reported that 81.84% of MLCs were discharged, 12.03% were referred to other hospitals for further management whereas deaths were 5.9%.

Conclusion

The Accident & Emergency Department of SSKH, Lady Hardinge Medical College deals with a reasonable number of MLCs due to the large urban population and easy accessibility from nearby areas. There was a significant drop in MLCs during Covid periods 2020 & 2021 from non-Covid period 2019. As the busiest hours to deal with MLCs were found between 6 p.m. and 11.59 p.m., hence, the concerned Surgery, Orthopaedics, Medicine and ENT departments should remain vigilant with well-trained manpower during those hours. The majority of the MLCs were found blunt force trauma caused by homicidal assault, followed by RTA and poisoning respectively that reflected the mindset of the people living in the region. Referral of 1.87% MLCs to other hospitals for further management and death of 4.15% victims of MLCs need to be addressed properly with the overall augmentation of medical facilities and services. The clinical forensic medicine branch should be developed well to deal with MLC documentation for the administration of proper justice in the court of law at a later stage.

References

  1. A record based study of frequency and pattern of medico legal cases reported at a tertiary care hospital in Miraj. (2017). Int J Commun Med Public Health, 4(4).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  2. A retrospective study of medico-legal cases coming to a tertiary care hospital of Malwa region of Punjab. (2020). Medico-Legal Update, 20(4).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  3. A study on medicolegal cases attended in a tertiary care hospital in South Kerala. (2018). Int J Health Sci Res, 8(11).
     Google Scholar
  4. A study pattern of medico-legal cases treated at a tertiary care hospital in central Karnataka. (2015). Indian J Forensic Commun Med, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-6776.2015.00002.8
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  5. An analysis of 3105 medico legal cases at tertiary care hospital Rawalpindi. (2017). Pak J Med Sci, 33(4).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  6. An analysis of medico-legal cases at a tertiary care hospital, Kakinada. (2019). Sch J Appl Med Sci, 7(11).
     Google Scholar
  7. Analysis of medico legal cases in a tertiary care hospital of South Kerala. (2020). Indian J Forensic Med &Amp;Toxicol, 14(3).
     Google Scholar
  8. Characteristics of medico-legal cases and errors in medico-legal reports at a teaching hospital in SaudiArabia. (2021). Open Access Emerg Med, 13.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  9. Characteristics of the traumatic forensic cases admitted to emergency department and errors in the forensic report writing. (2018). Bull Emerg Trauma, 6(1), 64-70.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  10. Etiology and demographic profile of medico-legal cases in emergency of a university hospital in Nepal. (2022). JIOM Nepal, 44(1), 68-71.
     Google Scholar
  11. Frequency and types of bodily medico-legal injuries in a rural area. (2010). J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 22(2).
     Google Scholar
  12. Injury amongst medico legal cases in department of forensic medicine of a teriary care centre: a descriptive cross-sectional study. (2021). J Nepal Med Assoc, 59(244).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  13. Medico-legal cases in an urban city in South Southern Nigeria; a hospital bases study. (2017). IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS), 16(6), 1-5.
     Google Scholar
  14. Medico-legal profile of brought dead cases at tertiary level in central Chhattisgarh–A research study. (2019). Int J Curr Adv Res, 8(11).
     Google Scholar
  15. Pattern and characteristic of injuries of medico legal cases. (2020). PJMHS, 14(4).
     Google Scholar
  16. Pattern of medico legal cases in a tertiary care hospital in North India. (2021). IARJ Med Sci, 2(4).
     Google Scholar
  17. Pattern of medico-legal cases in rural area of Faridabad, Haryana. (2013). J Indian Acad Forensic Med, 35(1).
     Google Scholar
  18. Pattern of medico-legal cases in the casualty department of a teaching hospital, Bareilly, Uttar-Pradesh. (2015). J Indian Acad Forensic Med, 37(4).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  19. Physical trauma—A leading cause of medico legal cases at DHQ hospital Abbottabad. (2010). J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 22(2).
     Google Scholar
  20. Profile and pattern of medico-legal cases attending tertiary care hospital in North India. (2015). Int J Med Pharm Sci, 5(5), 1-8.
     Google Scholar
  21. Profile and pattern of medico-legal cases in a tertiary care hospital of North India. (2016). J Med Sci Clin Res, 4(9).
     Google Scholar
  22. Profile of medico legal cases at Adesh institute of medical sciences and research, Bhatinda, Punjab. (2010). J Indian Acad Forensic Med, 32(2).
     Google Scholar
  23. Profile of medico legal cases in a tertiary centre of rural Karnataka. (2016). J Karnataka Med Leg Soc, 25(2), 6-9.
     Google Scholar
  24. Profile of medico legal cases in causality of a rural medical college of Hariyana. (2013). J Indian Acad Forensic Med, 35(4).
     Google Scholar
  25. Profile of medico-legal cases at JSS hospital, Mysuru—A two year prospective study. (2020). Indian J Forensic Med &Amp; Toxicol, 14(3).
     Google Scholar
  26. Profile of medico-legal cases coming to emergency ward of B. P. Koirala institute of health sciences. (2018). JBPKIHS, 1(2).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  27. Profile of medico-legal cases in casualty department of rural medical college, Maharashtra: retrospective study of one year. (2019). Indian J Forensic Med Pathol, 12(2).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  28. Profile of medico-legal cases in casualty of a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. (2021). Indian Internet J Forensic Med &Amp; Toxicol, 19(2), 27-31.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  29. Profile of medico-legal cases in tertiary care hospital in Jamnagar, Gujarat: retrospective study of one year. (2014). J Res Med Den Sci, 2(4), 57-62.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  30. Profile of medico-legal cases in the casualty of SAMC and PGI, Indore. (2017). Indian J Forensic Commun Med, 4(3).
     Google Scholar
  31. Profile of medico-legal cases registered at a tertiary care children’s hospital. (2017). Int J Contemp Pediatr, 4(4).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  32. Profile of medicolegal cases at rajendra institute of medical sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand from 2014–2015. (2016). IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS), 15(11).
     Google Scholar
  33. Profile of pattern of medico-legal cases in the casualty of a teaching hospital of Western region of Nepal. (2015). J Indian Acad Forensic Med, 37(1).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  34. Retrospective study of profile of medico-legal cases at Basaveshwara medical college, Chitradurga. (2021). Med Legal Update, 21(4).
     Google Scholar
  35. Retrospective study of profile of medico-legal cases in Tumkur, Karnataka. (2015). Int J Biomed Adv Res, 6(4).
     Google Scholar
  36. Study of medico-legal cases admitted at tertiary care hospital. (2020). IP Int J Forensic Med Toxicol Sci, 5(1), 1-4.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  37. Study on pattern of medico legal cases in casualty of government medical college Kolhapur, Maharashtra. (2021). IP Int J Forensic Med Toxicol Sci, 6(3).
     Google Scholar
  38. Types of medico-legal cases reported at the casualty department of Ayub teaching hospital Abbottabad. (2020). J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 32(1).
     Google Scholar