Validation Study for the Brazilian Population of the Nine Hole Peg Test Visumotor Evaluation Instrument

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Nanci Rebouças Souza de de Lala

  •   Fabrício Bruno Cardoso

Abstract

The present study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Nine Pins Visuomotor Integration (NHPT) assessment instrument for the Brazilian population, with the objective of measuring upper limb dexterity (arm and hand) of individuals between 04 and 14 years of age. Participated in the present study, 2765 individuals of both sexes, aged between 04 and 14 years. To perform the test, a square board with nine holes and 9 pins was used and the dominant and non-dominant hands were tested. The test was timed and the result measured by the time required for the individual to complete the activity, considering a maximum time of 300 seconds. In the quantitative validation stage, a statistical analysis was performed to obtain objective evidence regarding its functionality and effectiveness. Our results confirm the validity (accuracy) in the application of the NHPT test. In order to verify the reliability (trustworthiness) of the instrument proposed in this study, 3 steps were followed. The results showed high reliability (precision) in the scores for the non-preferred hand for children aged 4 to 14 years. Regarding the preferred hand, the values ​​show high reliability for children aged 04 to 8 years and 10 to 14 years and for children aged 9 years old, it showed good reliability, satisfying the rates recommended by the literature.: Through the results presented in this study, it was possible to , to conclude by the reliability of the test for which it proposes to evaluate, that is, the evidence is very safe in favor of the hypothesis that the results are correlated not only in the analyzed sample, but also for other experiments that may be carried out, to compare such domains by others.


Keywords: Assessment protocols, children, visuomotor

References

Maxwell JP, Capio, CM, Masters RSW. Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches. European Journal of Sport Science. 2017; 17(4): 407–416.

Van Abswoude, F, Mombarg R, de Groot W, Spruijtenburg GE, Steenbergen B. Implicit motor learning in primary school children: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2021: 1–19.

Burton AM, Eisenmann JC, Cowburn I, Lloyd RS, Till K. Developing motor competency in youths: Perceptions and practices of strength and conditioning coaches. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2021; 39(23): 2649-2657,

Cattuzzo MT, dos Santos Henrique R, Ré AHN, de Oliveira, IS, Melo BM, de Sousa Moura, M, et al. Motor competence and health related physical fitness in youth: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2016; 19(2): 123–129.

Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Cliff DP, Barnett LM, Okely AD. Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents: Review of Associated Health Benefits. Sports Medicine. 2010; 40(12): 1019–1035.

Bryant ES, Duncan MJ, Birch SL, Fundamental Movement Skills and Weight Status in British Primary School Children. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2014; 14: 730–736.

Julius MS, Meir R, Shechter-Nissim Z, Adi-Japha E. Children's ability to learn a motor skill is related to handwriting and reading proficiency, Learning and Individual Differences. Learning and Individual Differences. 2016; 51: 265-272.

Barnett LM, Salmon J, Hesketh, KD. More active pre-school children have better motor competence at school starting age: an observational cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 1068.

Junior AH, Fernandes CT, Cardoso, FB, Rosa HJG, Maciel CMLA. The influence between cognitive and motor domains in students from 7 to 9 years. Research, Society and Development. 2020; 9(4): 177942424.

Dathe AK, Jaekel J, Franzel J, Hoehn T, Felderhoff-Mueser U, Huening BM. Visual Perception, Fine Motor, and Visual-Motor Skills in Very Preterm and Term-Born Children before School Entry-Observational Cohort Study. Children (Basel). 2020; 7(12): 276.

van Veen S, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG, van Kaam AH, Oosterlaan J, Aarnoudse-Moens CSH. Visual perceptive skills account for very preterm children's mathematical difficulties in preschool. Early Hum Dev. 2019; 129: 11-15.

Bolk J, Padilla N, Forsman L, Broström L, Hellgren K, Åden U. Visual-motor integration and fine motor skills at 6½ years of age and associations with neonatal brain volumes in children born extremely preterm in Sweden: A population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e020478.

Valverde AA, Araújo CRS, Magalhães LC, Cardoso AA. Relationship between visual-motor integration and manual dexterity in children with developmental coordination disorder. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional. 2020; 28(3): 890-899.

Coetzee D, Pienaar AE, Van-Wyk Y. Relationship between academic achievement, visual-motor integration, gender and socio-economic status: North-West Child Health Integrated with Learning and Development study. South African Journal of Childhood Education. 2020; 10(1): a646.

Ercan ZG, Yilmaz Ş, Taş M, Aral N. Investigation of Visual Motor Integration Skills in Children with Speech Sound Problems. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2016; 123(3): 624-636.

Johansson GM, Häger CK. A modified standardized nine hole peg test for valid and reliable kinematic assessment of dexterity post-stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16(1): 8.

Menezes, PR, Nascimento, AF. Epidemiologia da depressão nas diversas fases da vida. Depressão no ciclo da vida., Lafer, B. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas. 2000: 80-102. Portuguese.

Luquetti LB, Laguardia J. Confiabilidade dos dados de atendimento odontológico do Sistema de Gerenciamento de Unidade Ambulatorial Básica (Sigab) em Unidade Básica de Saúde do Município do Rio de Janeiro. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2009; 18(3): 255-264. Portuguese.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
de Lala, N. R. S. de ., & Cardoso , F. B. . (2022). Validation Study for the Brazilian Population of the Nine Hole Peg Test Visumotor Evaluation Instrument. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 4(3), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.3.1238