Research Article

Factors Contributing To Academic Dishonesty Among Nursing Students In Kenya Medical Training College Western Kenya

Emily M. W. Wamalwa
Masinde Muliro University of Science & Technology, Kenya
* Corresponding author
John M. Okoth
Masinde Muliro University of Science & Technology, Kenya
Damaris Ochanda
Masinde Muliro University of Science & Technology, Kenya
DOI icon 10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.4.407

Read Counter
944

Downloads
433

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2020-07-20
Published 2020-08-07

Read counter = 944 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Introduction: Academic integrity is important in training of nurses since on completion of their studies the nurses will be involved in taking care of lives. Academic dishonesty among nursing students leads to putting the lives of patients at risk. The Purpose of this study was toassess factors contributing to academic dishonesty among Nursing Students in Kenya Medical Training Colleges in Western Kenya.

Methodology: A cross-sectional analytical design was employed in this study. Qualitative data was collected from lecturers, administrators, examination coordinators, disciplinary committee chair persons using Key informant interviews. Structured questionnaires for students and available records were used to collect quantitative data. Three colleges were randomly sampled to include Webuye and Bungoma in Bungoma County, kakamega in Kakamega County. Systematic sampling was used to select222 students who participated in the study while purposive sampling was used in selecting 12 key informants. Qualitative data collected addressed factors contributing to academic dishonest. Data entered in SPSS version 25 software and analysis done using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Odds ratio and p value were used to determine the strength of association. A p-value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant.

Findings: The results revealed that of the 202 students, about 47 % got involved in the academic malpractices of which most respondents were females. However, the study results did not reveal any relationship between respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender) and the acts of academic dishonesty although a higher proportion of females (48.6%) and those aged 20 years and above (49.5%) were involved. The study indicated that students were sensitized on academic dishonesty at the beginning of their program through various ways with students’ handbook being used the commonest (40.1%). Most common form of academic dishonesty students engaged in was cheating (71.6%);most students gave fear of consequences as the most important reason that deterred them from engaging in academic malpractices at 20%.Mainfactor contributing to academic dishonesty was the lack of lecturers to adhere to policies during administration of examinations (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2-4.5; 0.01). Other factors include students not aware of college rules (OR:0.6;95%CI:0.3-1.0;0.07), overcrowding (47.8%), accessibility to examination material (48.5%) and peer pressure (50.4%).

Conclusion: The study concludes that academic dishonesty is prevalent in the three colleges with cheating as the commonest form with various contributing factors namely: overcrowding and lack of lecturers adhering to policies in administration of examinations, followed by family pressure to perform well.

Recommendation: This study therefore recommends that lectures should adhere to college policies particularly during invigilation of examinations and the administration should ensure provision of enough spacing during examination. This will contribute immensely towards enhancing academic integrity among nursing students.

Keywords: Academic; dishonesty; nursing; students

References

  1. Boston University School of Public Health report, (2013). Confounding factors influencing academic integrity.
     Google Scholar
  2. Bowers (1964). Effects of social pressure on students for good grades.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bretag, T., & Harper. (2017) addressing contract cheating: Local and global responses. Project on contract cheating and assessment Design.
     Google Scholar
  4. Brimble, M. (2016) Why students cheat; an exploration of motivatirs of student academic dishonesty in higher education.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  5. Burnus, R, T., Graham, J.E., & Walker, M. (2011). Are my colleagues soft on academic crime? Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 12(3), 55-64.Retieved July 29, 2015 from https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-274409744/are-my-colleagues-soft-on-academiccrime.
     Google Scholar
  6. Centre for Academic Integrity (2012). About us. Retrieved from cheating. Explanation, responses and strategies. The journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 839-860. Retrieved July 29, 2015 from http://www.eacfaculty.org/pchideffer/Eng102f/plagiarism/organizational theory and student cheating.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  7. Coren, A. (2012). The theory of planned behaviour: will faculty confront students who cheat? Journal of Academic Ethics,10(3),171-184-Retrieved October 28,2015 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S10805-012-9162-7.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  8. Gallant, T. B. (2008). Academic integrity in the twenty first century: A teaching and Learning imperative. ASHE, Higher Education Report, 33(5), 1143. (EJ91635). Retrieved October 28,2015, from http://eric.ed.org/id=EJ791635.
     Google Scholar
  9. Gallant, T. B, & Drinan, P. (2006). Organizational theory and student Hamlin, A., Barczk, C., Powell, G., & Frost, J. (2013). A comparison of University efforts to contain academic dishonesty. Journal of legal, ethical and regulatory issues, 16(1), 35-46. Retrieved July 29,2015 fromhttp://www.read periodicals.com/201301/300195141.html.
     Google Scholar
  10. Hamlin, A., & Powell, G. (2008). Academic dishonesty at southern Utah University: Policies, procedures and experiences in the school of business. Journal of the academy of business administration.
     Google Scholar
  11. Hensley, L. (2013). To cheat or not to cheat: A review with implications for practice. The community college enterprise, 19(2), 22-34 ’Retrieved July 29, 2015, from https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1g1-3559387581 to cheat-or-not-to-cheat-a-review-with-implication.
     Google Scholar
  12. Huang, C-L. Yang, S. C & Chen, A-S (2015). The relationships among students’ achievement goals, willingness to report academic dishonesty and engaging in academic dishonesty social behaviour and personality. An international Journal, 43(1), 27-37. doi:10.2224/sbp.2015.43.1.27. Retrieved may 30, 2017, from https://www.sbp.journal.com/index.pup/sbp/article/view/13 634.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  13. Hulsart, R, & McCarthy, V (2009). Educator’s role in promoting academicintegrity,10. Academic of educational leadership journal, 13(4), 49-60. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from http://www.glass-castle.com/clients/www-nocheating-org/adcouncil/research/cheating fact sheet.html.
     Google Scholar
  14. Jones, D. L R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication quarterly, volume 74, number2, June 2011.141-150. Retrieved on July 13, 2017 from https: debdavis.pbworks.com.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  15. Josien, L., & Broderick, B. (2013). Cheating in higher education: The case of multi-methods cheaters. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(3), 93–105.
     Google Scholar
  16. Kitahara, R., Westfall, F., & Mankelwicz, J. New, multi-faceted hybrid approaches to ensuring academic integrity. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com/ manuscripts/10480.pdf, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  17. Lang, J. M (2013). Classroom practice. Are teachers creating classroom cheats? Times educational supplement,30(5059).23-32. Retrieved July, 29, 2015 from https://www.tes.com/articleaspx?story code=6352762.
     Google Scholar
  18. McCabe, D-L, Trevino, L. K & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic: A Decade of Research, Ethics & Behavior 11(3).
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  19. Mckibban, A. R & Burdsal, C, A (2-13), Academic dishonesty, an in depth investigation ofassessing measurable constructs and a call for consistency in scholarship journal of academic Ethics 11(3),185-197.Retrieved October 28,2015 fromhttp://doi.org/10.1007/S10805-013-9187-6.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  20. Mcmillan, J. H & Schumacher, S. (2010). Researchineducation: Evidence-based inquiry (7thed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
     Google Scholar
  21. Method scheaters. Academy of educational leadership journal,17(2),93-105. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from, From https://www.questia.com/library/journal/ip3-2999118601/cheating-in-higher education-the-case-of -multi-methods.
     Google Scholar
  22. Morris, E. J., & Carroll, J. (2016) Academic Integrity: A teaching and learning approach in developing a sustainable holistic institutional approach.
     Google Scholar
  23. Nahirams Aslam (2010). Topology of reasons for students cheating. Boston.
     Google Scholar
  24. Newstead, Franklin-Stokes & Armstead (1996). Studies in correlation between grade point average and frequency of cheating.
     Google Scholar
  25. Newton, P. M. (2016). Academic integrity: A qualitative study of confidence and Understanding in students at the start of their higher education. Assessment&Evaluation in higher Education,41(3). 482-497. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1024199. Retrieved may30, 2017, from https://cronfa.swan.ac.Uk/record/cronfa20205/Download/0020205-17042015081413.pdf.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  26. Academic dishonesty among higher institutions of learning. (Finn&Frone, 2004).
     Google Scholar
  27. Sub Saharan contributory factors to academic dishonesty Ellis, Zucker& Randall, 2018).
     Google Scholar
  28. (Nurses code of ethics handbook; 2008). Professional conduct of nurses at work place.
     Google Scholar
  29. Novotney, A. (2011). Beat the cheat. Monitor on psychology, 42(6), 54, Retrieved July 29, 2015, http://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/06/cheat.aspx.
     Google Scholar
  30. Olfason, L., Schraw, G., & Kerwald, N. (2014). Academic dishonesty: Behaviours, Sanctio ns and retention of adjudicated college student development,55(7), 661-674. doi:10.1353/csd.2014.0066.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  31. Open Education Database (2010). Astonishing stats on academic cheating. Houston, Tx: oedb.org. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from http://oedb.org/ilibrarian/astonishing-stats-on-academic-cheating.
     Google Scholar
  32. Owunwanne, D., Rustagi, N., & Dada, R. (2010). Students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in higher institutions, Journal of college teaching and learning, 7(11), 59-68. doi:1019030/tlc.v7:11.253. Retrieved may30, 2017, from https://www.chiteinstitute.com/jos/index.php/tlc/article/download/253/243.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  33. Ellis,Zucker & Randall(2018),Strategies in curbing academic dishonesty in African students.
     Google Scholar
  34. Harper and Mahmud, (2017), Probable causes of academic malpractices.
     Google Scholar
  35. Kitahara, R, Westfall, F. & Mankelwicz, J. (2011). New multimedia faceted hybrid.
     Google Scholar
  36. Cole, M. T., Swartz, L. B., & Shelley, D. J. (2014). Students ‘use of technology in learning course material: Is it cheating? International Journal of information and communication Technology Education (IJICTE).10(1),35 48.doi:10.4818/ijicte.2014010104.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar